The brief, which supports a Stanford Daily lawsuit alleging infringements on student free speech, has been signed by 54 other student newspapers and student newspaper leaders.
Jack Olson
Managing Editor, The Buckley Beacon
The Yale Daily News has joined 43 other student publications in signing an amicus brief last week in a lawsuit which alleges that Trump administration officials violated free speech protections in their action to deport or revoke the visas of noncitizen students who advocated for pro-Palestinian causes. The YDN made the announcement this morning.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem were named as defendants in the August complaint filed by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) on behalf of the Stanford Daily student newspaper and two other unnamed individuals. The complaint alleges that the Stanford Daily and the two unnamed individuals, both international students on F-1 visas, have “self-censored” their speech for fear of consequences from the administration.
“Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the Trump administration are trying to turn the inalienable human right of free speech into a privilege contingent upon the whims of a federal bureaucrat,” the August 6 complaint read.
FIRE previously supported Harvard University’s lawsuit against the Trump administration, calling the administration’s freezing of federal funding over anti-Israel demonstrations “flatly unlawful and unconstitutional.”
The amicus brief, prepared by the Student Press Law Center (SPLC) and filed last Wednesday, emphasized the importance of student journalism and condemned the “unconstitutional chilling effect” the administration’s actions have allegedly had on student speech. The brief substantiated its claim of a chilling effect on student speech by pointing to the controversial arrest of Columbia University student Mahmoud Khalil, whose case became a ralling cry for anti-Trump protesters earlier this year. The brief, for example, also cites a case of a student paper at the University of Michigan retroactively anonymizing articles authored by international students for fear of “serious threat of harm or to the safety of the author.”
“Independent student journalists are responsible for recording the news of the day on and around campus,” Ariela Lopez (YC ‘27), editor-in-chief and president of the YDN, told The Buckley Beacon. “When international students are deterred from sharing their perspectives or afraid of preserving their voices in the News’ historical record, our ability to fulfil that responsibility is compromised.”
The SPLC brief concluded by urging the court to grant the plaintiffs’ motion for a summary judgement, which would bypass a lengthy trial and allow the judge to rule on the case quickly. Five other amicus briefs have been submitted in support of the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, including from the Cato Institute, the ACLU of Northern California, and the state of Washington.
U.S. attorneys defending the administrations’ actions have argued in a September 24 cross-motion for a summary judgment in their favor that the plaintiffs lack standing to make the complaint. The attorneys argued that since none of the plaintiffs were a target of the administration’s actions, their claims of injury by federal actions are not valid. Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, referred to the lawsuit as “baseless” and “political” in a statement to The Hill on August 6.
Rubio’s office has not made an official statement on the ongoing lawsuit.
Stanford Daily Publishing Co. v. Rubio et. al. is set to be heard in November in the San Jose Northern District of California federal court.
_
Editor’s correction: A prior version of this article stated that both Noem’s and Rubio’s offices have not commented on the lawsuit filed by FIRE. It has been updated to reflect an August 6 statement made by DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin to The Hill.